<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="dn2001-0911">
  <review>
    <reviewbody>I listened to most of this broadcast this morning, and there is some really amazing footage here. Amy interrupts a taped interview to bring the breaking news and they continue to monitor the events of the day. One interesting aspect is the number of reports that turn out to be unfounded, such as a car bomb of the state department and explosions at the capitol. Most interesting are the live reports of multiple explosions happening after the planes hit the building. At one point Amy is reporting that three or possibly four planes hit the WTC to try to explain the explosions. Even after the towers fell witnesses and reporters continue to report explosions and what sound like bombs going off. It's also interesting that they note it appears that the towers just disintegrated as they fell. Amy also reports throughout the broadcast that a Palestinian group had taken responsibility for the Pentagon attack. These things were all lost, obviously, in the tragedy of the day, but five years later they allow for further investigation.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Amazing Footage</reviewtitle>
    <stars>5</stars>
    <reviewer>JackStrawFromWichita</reviewer>
    <createdate>2006-09-11 18:42:47</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2006-09-11 18:42:47</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>you claim to have universal access to human knowledge but you have removed the page &#13;
&#13;
&#13;
http://www.archive.org/details /bbc200109111654-1736&#13;
&#13;
you should explain to your readers why you have done this as ppl have a right to know what you don't want them too see !!&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
this is what they don't want you too see &#13;
&#13;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>censorship</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>stefnewage</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2007-03-07 19:57:34</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2007-03-07 19:57:34</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>@stefnewage &#13;
I should be concerned because the BBC inacturately reported a building falling?  Geez, come on.  There is no conspiracy here.  If anything, it was inevitable that #7 was going to fall.  At best, it was a lucky (20 minute) guess by the BBC.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>huh?</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>kepper</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2007-03-08 13:12:51</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2007-03-08 13:12:51</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>...and what proof do you have that anybody was trying to conceal anything?&#13;
&#13;
Wrong Address:&#13;
http://www.archive.org/details /bbc200109111654-1736&#13;
Correct Address:&#13;
http://www.archive.org/details/bbc200109111654-1736&#13;
Conspiracy?&#13;
Definitely!&#13;
</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Back up now... remove the extra space from the address...</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>bjlauder</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2007-07-03 00:18:20</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2007-07-03 00:18:20</createdate>
    <stars>0</stars>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>4</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>4.33</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
